Re: Difficulty installing on 'noname' from disks-alpha/1998-07-02
At 11:18 AM 8/17/98 -0400, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Aug 1998, Peter Mott wrote:
>> After fsck is complete, a message says something about not mounting any
>Hmmm....I'm wondering if this could be related to the "root mounted
>read-only" problem we were having before...?? When you can, check to see
>if the root partition is mounting read-only, which would prevent it from
>updating /etc/mtab. I know I ran into that problem before with my second
>UDB (before the hard drive died). I don't recall if that kind of message
>was echoed to me or not though.
Explicitly specifying 'rw' in the milo boot command has no effect on my
'boot sda3:vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3 rw'
exhibits the same behavior as
'boot sda3:vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3'
Does this answer the 'read-only' question?
Peter Mott | mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org | Voice: 508.647.7375
| http://www.mathworks.com | FAX: 508.647.7002
PGP fingerprint: AAB3 CC97 3045 15F1 A9CC ECA2 0207 FB0A 0997 8F31