Re: base disks copied to master
On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Is anyone working on building a set of kernels and rescue images, or is it the
> case that we should promote some set of files from one of the previous
> directory trees? The former feels better, the latter might allow us to make
> it easier for folks to dive in and help us out... thoughts?
I would suggest building a new set to incorporate some security fixes and
other changes in the latest kernel revisions. Plus, it would help to
further test the kernel-package revisions to make sure things will go
smoothly from now on with that.
I still have all of the configs, but it would take me weeks to revise
them and compile the kernels. If I manage to get my second UDB running
tonight (with a 2G drive...yeah!), then I'll start on them at home and
get them done faster.
Also, barring problems regarding them, you could probably bring the latest
batch of kernels on master to the "current" (at least for now...or leave
them in a seperate folder until we get new ones) and also bring up the
latest available versions of the rescue disks. I would suspect that those
should do for now. Also, once we get this MILO problem licked, we should
get a full set of MILOs on master too....probably would be REALLY nice to
have a disk image of each MILO made and just include that in whatever
installation instructions we have. That way, instead of having to copy
MILO, etc, then rawrite/dd the disk images...etc....they can just
rawrite/dd the whole batch of disks and make it less complicated.
C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: