Re: Problems with libc 2.0.6-0.5
On Thu 22 Jan 1998, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> I agree. Plus, it would allow you to repair a hosed partition and look
> over it in the event that your libc got screwed up somehow. FYI, static
> binaries in /bin are the norm on most UN*X products.
SysVR4 and (hence?) Solaris 2 have /bin a symlink to /usr/bin. The
static binaries are in /sbin (although there are also a couple of
dynamic binaries in there as well). Unfortunately, /usr/sbin contains
almost only dynamic binaries. Oh well...
I'm not saying I agree with SysVR4, BTW :-)
home: email@example.com | work: firstname.lastname@example.org
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .