Re: Debian-Alpha port ideas...please read (long)

[James Troup <J.J.Troup@comp.brad.ac.uk>]

Nikita Schmidt <cetus@snowball.ucd.ie> writes:

> I would rather prefer having those packages fixed.  I agree that
> dselectability is an important thing, and yet I feel a bit
> uncomfortable with stubs and anachronisms like ldso.
> --force-depends is my friend.

I hate to butt in on your "ix86-originated" `g`-suffixed library
bashing, but how is ldso an anachronism?  How exactly do you expect,
e.g. dpkg-shlibdeps to work without ldso?  (Hint: look at where ldd
comes from)

-- 
James


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .