Re: gcc?
On Sun, 28 Sep 1997, Nikita Schmidt wrote:
> I tried egcs and found it very nice. It does not need any pesky patches
> and is much more aware of linux-alpha (which the FSF gcc does not even
> support). Although egcs is considered development version and does not
> have public releases, I believe that linux-alpha support in it is way
> more stable than the one in patched-gcc.
Don't they have releases every few months and snapshots in between? Or
haven't they got to the first `release' yet?
Can it cope with exceptions? If so, maybe we should use it to produce a
`menu' binary ...
Just a thought.
Nikhil.
--
Nikhil Nair
Trinity College, Cambridge, England
Tel.: +44 1223 368353
Email: nn201@cus.cam.ac.uk
nnair@debian.org
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc?
- From: Nikita Schmidt <cetus@snowball.ucd.ie>
- References:
- Re: gcc?
- From: Nikita Schmidt <cetus@snowball.ucd.ie>