Re: Compiling packages automatically
On Sat, 8 Nov 1997, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Sure! Put the info about what didn't compile cleanly somewhere (I don't
My script keeps lists of known good, and known bad packages.
These are trivial to publish, of course. :)
The stdout+stderr listing makes it easier to see at once
what the problem was, and whether it might be a problem with
the build environment ("bash: gcc: command not found" :) or
the package.
> As an aside, I'd be pleased to look over your script, I'm thinking of doing
> something similar to another architecture...
I'll send it later, after I finish tweaking it.
> So, when do we get to see the .deb files that did build cleanly on master? :-)
"Built cleanly" means that my script didn't notice any
errors. I wasn't even going to mention that the packages
will have to be tested (well, a subset of them, at least)
and compared to existing Alpha .debs (some of which, I
assume, have patches that aren't in the official Debian
package source). But after we get the auto-compiling system
running smoothly, uploading packages automatically shouldn't
be a problem.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: