[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: purposes



    Quite doable.  The package came with a bootdisk :)


>
>Now try doing it w/o a bootable CD.
>
>Linux isn't really about supporting the man with the extra ram and
everything
>else, there are users out there w/ 386 and 486 boxes, 2x cds, 14.4
modems...
>
>
>--- Steven Walsh <swalsh@d.umn.edu> wrote:
>>
>> >> An interesting editorial I looked at the other day said
>> >> that caldera had a distribution that installed purely graphically,
>> >> with minimal intervention.  The writer did comment that the whole
>> >> setup was harder to administer in a traditional unix/linux manner,
>> >> so it wasn't going to please anyone.
>> >
>> >I gave the install to an NT admin as a test and the commercial boot
loader
>> >broke NT.
>> >
>>
>>
>>     Odd.  I just did a Caldera 2.2 install on my system (K6-2 400mHz,
96mb
>> SDRAM(66mHz), 6gb hdd, 2gb hdd, Riva TNT, 56k modem, 10bT ethernet, SB
PNP)
>> last night.  Ironically, I had more trouble with just booting from the
CDROM
>> than I did from using the Windows 9x installation interface that Caldera
>> provided.  I was really impressed.
>>
>>     I'm not sure what I think of their graphical bootup screen, though,
or
>> their BootMagic loader instead of the traditional LILO interface.   The
>> former seems to hide a lot of the readouts from the user (though dmesg is
>> available).  Admittedly, I haven't looked into disabling it yet.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>===
>John van Vlaanderen
>
>      #########################################
>      #    CXN, Inc. Contact:                 #
>      #    john@thinman.com, www.thinman.com  #
>      #    1 917 309 7379 (cell, voice mail)  #
>      #########################################
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-admintool-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>


Reply to: