[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: purposes



Now try doing it w/o a bootable CD.

Linux isn't really about supporting the man with the extra ram and everything
else, there are users out there w/ 386 and 486 boxes, 2x cds, 14.4 modems...


--- Steven Walsh <swalsh@d.umn.edu> wrote:
> 
> >> An interesting editorial I looked at the other day said
> >> that caldera had a distribution that installed purely graphically,
> >> with minimal intervention.  The writer did comment that the whole
> >> setup was harder to administer in a traditional unix/linux manner,
> >> so it wasn't going to please anyone.
> >
> >I gave the install to an NT admin as a test and the commercial boot loader
> >broke NT.
> >
> 
> 
>     Odd.  I just did a Caldera 2.2 install on my system (K6-2 400mHz, 96mb
> SDRAM(66mHz), 6gb hdd, 2gb hdd, Riva TNT, 56k modem, 10bT ethernet, SB PNP)
> last night.  Ironically, I had more trouble with just booting from the CDROM
> than I did from using the Windows 9x installation interface that Caldera
> provided.  I was really impressed.
> 
>     I'm not sure what I think of their graphical bootup screen, though, or
> their BootMagic loader instead of the traditional LILO interface.   The
> former seems to hide a lot of the readouts from the user (though dmesg is
> available).  Admittedly, I haven't looked into disabling it yet.
> 
> 
> 
> 

===
John van Vlaanderen

      #########################################
      #    CXN, Inc. Contact:                 #
      #    john@thinman.com, www.thinman.com  #
      #    1 917 309 7379 (cell, voice mail)  #                   
      #########################################
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


Reply to: