Re: gnat-4.6.1-9
Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> writes:
>
>> I have just uploaded a new version of package "gnat" which changes the
>> default Ada compiler from gnat-4.4 to gnat-4.6. This marks the
>> beginning of the transition of all other Ada packages to gnat-4.6. The
>> first such package will be asis, which I am building now.
>
> I'm not sure if this is related, but after I installed 'gnat', I wanted
> to install gnat-4.6.1-9 (since it is the latest).
No, the latest is gnat-4.6 is 4.6.1-5. It requires gcc-4.6 >= 4.6.1-9.
> However, aptitude can't figure out how to do it:
>
> stephe@Shevek$ sudo schroot -- aptitude install --without-recommends gnat-4.6
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> cpp-4.6 gcc-4.6 gcc-4.6-base gnat-4.6 gnat-4.6-base libgcc1 libgnat-4.6
> libgnatprj4.6 libgnatvsn4.6 libgomp1 libquadmath0
> 11 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 184 not upgraded.
> Need to get 26.3 MB of archives. After unpacking 32.8 kB will be used.
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libstdc++6: Depends: gcc-4.6-base (= 4.6.1-4) but 4.6.1-9 is to be installed.
> libgfortran3: Depends: gcc-4.6-base (= 4.6.1-4) but 4.6.1-9 is to be installed.
> g++-4.6: Depends: gcc-4.6-base (= 4.6.1-4) but 4.6.1-9 is to be installed.
> Depends: gcc-4.6 (= 4.6.1-4) but 4.6.1-9 is to be installed.
> gfortran-4.6: Depends: gcc-4.6-base (= 4.6.1-4) but 4.6.1-9 is to be installed.
> Depends: gcc-4.6 (= 4.6.1-4) but 4.6.1-9 is to be installed.
> libstdc++6-4.6-dev: Depends: gcc-4.6-base (= 4.6.1-4) but 4.6.1-9 is to be installed.
> The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
>
> Remove the following packages:
> 1) gnat
> 2) gnat-4.6
> 3) libaunit2-dev
> 4) libxmlada4.1-dev
You should accept this solution because of libaunit2-dev and
libxmlada4.1-dev; it is they who break the dependencies. Then,
reinstall gnat and gnat-4.6; then install libxmlada4.1-dev from Debian
as opposed to from your own build.
HTH
--
Ludovic Brenta.
Reply to: