Re: new ada branch for common utils
xavier grave <email@example.com> writes:
> Hi everybody,
> I'd like to create a new branch (monotone one @ ada-france) to factorise
> all Ada tools/utils we have around, for example :
> - in org.log4Ada
> - in narval.core.pro
> get interfaces (for linux and freebsd)
> get address
> Do you agree on such new branch and how do you think we should call it ?
I'm all for factorizing but... putting unrelated bits and pieces
together in a branch is not exactly factorizing, is it? If these bits
and pieces formed a consistent whole, you wouldn't have to ask the
question of how to name the branch, methinks.
So, if you really think these should be in a different branch, I'd
suggest creating several branches e.g. org.xavier-grave.options,
BTW, how is options.ad[sb] different from GNAT.Command_Line (which
contains a binding to GNU getopt)?