Quoting Cyril Brulebois (email@example.com): > Christian PERRIER <firstname.lastname@example.org> (08/07/2012): > > I think the discussion made the decision and is actually a GO to > > switch to g-i as default, right? > > I'm pretty happy to see people want to work on this. Really. > > However I'm a little sad this kind of heavy changes is kept for after > the freeze, and long after the call for comments for beta 1. It seems that the only needed changes are on debian-cd side. > > Can somebody please write a summary of the needed changes (meaning at > least the involved packages)? AFAIK no package impacted. > > I'm tempted to call it way too late for beta 1, and to ask for its being > considered for a beta 2 or rc 1 only. Or just wheezy+1. We're 1.5 year > after the squeeze release; surely there was plenty of time to think > about doing this earlier. Well, I'm afraid we have to live with the fact that less and less people care about d-i during the development process (I also reduced my own involvment, so I'm among these "people" too). But there's indeed nothing we can really change about that. *Still* we have a bit more people working on D-I right now, this is kind of a consolation, isn't it? So, well, there might be a risk but it's not like g-i isn't tested, isn't it?
Description: Digital signature