Hi, You're right for upstream. But what about Debian? In my opinion there're 2 approaches: of course, I can make things work building git release of spd. But it doesn't fix the Debian problem. So maybe it's better to solve the bug in the Debian package, or upgrading the Debian package to the latest git release, so that the problem is fixed in Debian for the distro, and not only for me, advanced or power users. What do you think of this? My question is more about Debian strategy than for myself, because yes I can build but is it interesting for a distro? Regards, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL Le dimanche 31 juillet 2011 à 10:35 +1000, Jason White a écrit : > Jean-Philippe MENGUAL <mengualjeanphi@free.fr> wrote: > > Actually I did a last test. Here's the speech-dispatcher's log: > > http://demo.accelibreinfo.eu (contains espeak-pico.log and > > speech-dispatcher.log). In my opinion it shows that the program runs > > properly, but there's a problem with pico module. What do you think? > > Should I report bug? > > It appears you are using the generic module rather than the Pico module. > > There is a Pico module in the Git repository of Speech-Dispatcher. I would > suggest upgrading your Speech-Dispatcher to the latest code and testing the > Pico module. I don't think Speech-Dispatcher maintainers would be interested > in bug reports from an old version that requires you to use the generic module > as a work-around. > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=