[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: speechd-up


Thanks Mario, I had an excellent day with lintian. Really...
extraordinary! great experience! ... lol Well actually it was really,
really hard!! :)

But I hope I succeeeded. Thanks very much to Samuel for his mandatory
help and his patience/calm in front of my problems learning. I hope
these hours and energy will be useful to allow me to help this team.
Here's the new package, compliant to lintian, except for the manpage
which doesn't exist upstream and that helpman doesn't produce properly.
Anyway, --help gives what the user needs and I patched README to help

I wait for feedbacks,



Jean-Philippe MENGUAL

Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 à 17:17 +0200, Mario Lang a écrit :
> Jean-Philippe MENGUAL <mengualjeanphi@free.fr> writes:
> > On:
> > http://demo.accelibreinfo.eu/speechd-up.tar.gz
> > you'll find a new Debian package, with all needed. I would like to add
> > it to Debian.
> E: speechd-up: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object usr/bin/speechd-up
> W: speechd-up: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-version
> W: speechd-up: wrong-bug-number-in-closes l89:#nnnn
> E: speechd-up: helper-templates-in-copyright
> E: speechd-up: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate
> E: speechd-up: description-starts-with-package-name
> E: speechd-up: package-contains-info-dir-file usr/share/info/dir.gz
> E: speechd-up: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs etc/init.d/speechd-up: required-start
> E: speechd-up: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs etc/init.d/speechd-up: required-stop
> W: speechd-up: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/speechd-up
> lintian is your friend.
> You need to fix all the errors at least.
> Ideally, the package should be lintian-clean, if you are trying to find
> a sponsor.
> > Finally, note that's an ubuntu package base I debianized to be cleaner
> > (in copyright, rules, etc.). 
> I am trying to decide if the implications of this sentence are
> hilariously funny or saddeningly serious :-).
> -- 
> CYa,
>   ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕

Reply to: