Re: Booting Kernel on Amiga 3000
Hi Stephen,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 2:01 AM Stephen Walsh <vk3heg@vk3heg.net> wrote:
> > I think we really need to see the output of "amiboot -d",
> > for both the good and the bad cases.
>
> I had amiboot like so:
>
> amiboot -d -k vmlinux-5.15.0-2-m68k -r initrd.img-5.15.0-2-m68k
> root=/dev/sda2 fb=false
>
> Didn't see anything different, in the output except for this at the
> start of the process:
>
> https://amiga.vk3heg.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/PXL_20220909_120251490.MP_-scaled.jpg
Which says "ramdisk dest is 0x0f83283d"...
> Kernel/Intrd: 5.15.0-2-m68k
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.15.0-2-m68k (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc-11 (Debian 11.2.0-12) 11.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.37) #1 Debian 5.15.5-2 (2021-12-18)
> [ 0.000000] printk: console [debug0] enabled
> [ 0.000000] Amiga hardware found: [A3000] VIDEO BLITTER AMBER_FF AUDIO FLOPPY A3000_SCSI KEYBOARD MOUSE SERIAL PARALLEL A3000_CLK CHIP_RAM PAULA DENISE_HR AGNUS_HR_PAL MAGIC_REKICK ZORRO3
> [ 0.000000] Ignoring memory chunk at 0x7800000:0x800000 before the first chunk
> [ 0.000000] Fix your bootloader or use a memfile to make use of this area!
> [ 0.000000] Zone ranges:
> [ 0.000000] DMA [mem 0x0000000008000000-0x000000ffffffffff]
> [ 0.000000] Normal empty
> [ 0.000000] Movable zone start for each node
> [ 0.000000] Early memory node ranges
> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008000000-0x000000000fffffff]
> [ 0.000000] Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x0000000008000000-0x000000000fffffff]
> [ 0.000000] initrd: 0783283d - 08000000
... which does not match 0783283d?
Interestingly, this is the working case.
While the non-working case in your next email has
"ramdisk dest is 0x0f7f6794" and a matching
"initrd: 0f7f6794 - 10000000".
/me confused even more...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Reply to: