[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Using Debian funds to support a gcc development task

On 9/29/19 1:17 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned about your argumentation style in this thread.  It
> feels to me a lot like you're saying that people are wrong simply
> because they are disagreeing with you.  In future discussions, I'd
> recommend finding a way of having the discussion that acknowledges
> disagreement and is more focused on understanding positions than judging
> them or persuading others.

I don't think that this is the case. I'm just arguing that we have double
standards here. You can't say one the one hand, that Debian money should
not use for non-Debian work and then spend it on outreachy and you cannot
say that architecture must be widely available for use and just emulators
and then allow s390x to be a release architecture.

> Regardless, I think you have your answer.
> Absent the appearance of significant new support, there is not
> sufficient interest in spending Debian funds on m68k gcc development.

I don't think we have heard enough voices yet to be able to answer that


 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Reply to: