Re: The future of an SCC that has been given up on
Andreas Schwab dixit:
>schmitz <schmitz@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de> writes:
>
>> I begin to understand the nightmare. X will have to be built then.
>
>But only the client libraries, which don't depend on the X server.
Well, X is X and I don’t care about whether it’s one package less
for the server… the server’s not the dependency nightmare involved.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
13:37⎜«Natureshadow» Deep inside, I hate mirabilos. I mean, he's a good
guy. But he's always right! In every fsckin' situation, he's right. Even
with his deeply perverted taste in software and borked ambition towards
broken OSes - in the end, he's damn right about it :(! […] works in mksh
Reply to: