On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:22:00PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:10:59AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:39:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > > > > > > * build cross compiler > If m68k can not build with the standard gcc compiler, shouldn't that be set Perhaps. I didn't feel like adding back the defines they already removed. Personally, I'd rather get the compiler fixed, but that bugs been around a while. > in control and config/m68k/defines? I changed that, but the build still uses > gcc-4.3... hmm All I changed was .... Index: debian/config/m68k/defines =================================================================== --- debian/config/m68k/defines (revision 12962) +++ debian/config/m68k/defines (working copy) @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ [base] -#compiler: gcc-3.3 +compiler: gcc-4.2 flavours: amiga atari Index: debian/config/defines =================================================================== --- debian/config/defines (revision 12962) +++ debian/config/defines (working copy) @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ [relations] gcc-4.3: gcc-4.3 +gcc-4.2: gcc-4.2 initramfs-fallback: linux-initramfs-tool initramfs-tools: initramfs-tools (>= 0.55) util-vserver: util-vserver (>= 0.30.215) > > > on a freshly installed lenny box (with some gcc packages from unstable). The > > > circular dependencies are not so nice, but it seems I got it installed. Do > > > you want to add amd64 packages to your repository? > > > > If you want. If I really thought anyone cared, I could build amd64 > > packages too. ;) > > Might be helpful, I tried to cross build gcc-4.2, but I did not get a libgcc2-m68k-cross > package, why not? I don't know. The one from gcc-4.3 should work. Heck, I've been trying to follow *your* directions. ;) peace, stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature