On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:05:48PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > it worked very well for me. So everything is in good shape, you don't need > > my help (its a lot of patches, though...). > > You don't need all of them, some are really WIP (e.g. the platform > device patches). > > We used to have Linux/m68k CVS for the sufficiently stable current > version, but now that's gone, I should probably be a little bit more > careful what I put there ;-) Well for instance you have a "# FIXME Just for testing" comment in the series file for 2.6.26, so I stopped applying patches beyond that. I think there's a case for just including the patches above "# NEXT_PATCHES_END" and letting people tell me which ones to cherry pick beyond that. Unfortunately, all the aranym patches seem to live beyond that. I'd be happy if there was a well-formed comment that I could code around to drop out a series of patches or to not include patches beyond. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature