[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [patch 1/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT (SMC91C111) driver (updated)



On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> attached is the updated Atari EtherNAT aka SMC91C111 ethernet driver. The
> driver is functional (i.e. does no longer mangle the first two bytes of a
> packet).
> 
> I had to fudge with the SMC_PUSH_DATA function (the register interface appears
> to be little endian but the data buffers are big endian), and decided to stick
> that into the main driver instead of smc91x.h in the end.
> 
> Interrupts are still missing, the driver operates from a timer routine
> instead.

Thanks, updated. But...  it doesn't seem to compile?

drivers/net/atari_91C111.c: In function 'smc_rcv':
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:584: error: implicit declaration of function 'readsw'
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c: In function 'smc_hardware_send_pkt':
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:729: error: implicit declaration of function 'writew_be'
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:729: error: implicit declaration of function 'writesw'
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c: In function 'atari_ethernat_pdev_probe':
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2317: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no member named 'irq_flags'
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2361: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no member named 'irq_flags'
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2371: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no member named 'irq_flags'
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2411: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no member named 'irq_flags'
drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2280: warning: unused variable 'pd'

This is atari_defconfig with all `new' Atari drivers enabled.

BTW, can you please run scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patches?

| total: 63 errors, 87 warnings, 2621 lines checked

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds


Reply to: