[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nfblock vs udev

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:

>> So it should be named bootstrap.tos or should that just be documented?
> I guess it should just be renamed - you don't usually care whether the  
> bootstrap runs as GEM or TOS app (the screen output is cleaner in the TOS 
> one anyway).

Okay, I'll make a note of it for the next atari-bootstrap upload.

> We should close it with the next kernel upload... with any luck, I'll 
> have the SMC91C111 driver working by then (it did finally own up to 
> detecting the proper hardware, instead of stuffing up the ROM-port card 
> or just hanging the kernel).

Sounds great.

>>> (Apologies if I seem unresponsive at this time - the mail system at my old
>>> lab is migrated to postfix by a new admin, and that often results in no
>>> mail going out for a few days ...)
>> Bummer. Maybe when he's done we can get q650's mail working again.
>> Running a buildd with email is a total drag.
> I guess I'll let him fix outgoing relay for the whole domain first, 
> before adding something like incoming relay :-)
> I'll play with postfix some on my UUCP relay so I'll have a config snip  
> ready when the time comes.
> Any news on the buildd front?

Two potentials, but no solution yet.



Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: