[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nfblock vs udev



On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:36:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> I managed to get a udev on nfblock debug log at [3].
>> [3] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/tmp/udevboot.log
>>
>> Hopefully someone can make sense of it and help me out. Right now
>> nfblock kernels and debian-installer don't play nicely together.
>
> What's the number of ramdisk devices you can have? I notice ram15 is not, 
> in fact, ever generated as device node. Does udev on IDE behave  
> differently?
>
> Other than that, the IDE probe seems to spawn edd_id which does report  
> thusly:
>
> edd_id[278]: main: no kernel EDD support
>
> udevd-event[268]: run_program: '/lib/udev/edd_id' (stderr) 'no kernel EDD 
> support'

running /lib/udev/edd_id gives the response 'no kernel EDD support' but
doesn't crash (at least not interactively when udev has not been
started).

> Maybe that's killing you? Does IDE emulation also report missing EDD  
> support?

What would I have to do to check?

>> Christian: I'd like to see the patches in [1] in the next
>> linux-2.6 release. We should also be able to move linux-2.6 to
>> the same compiler version, currently gcc-4.1, as the other archs.
>> This requires the m68k-build-id.diff patch.
>
> I'd like to see another patch - the correction of operator precedence in  
> atari_keyb_init which I reported yesterday to linux-m68k. The patch will  
> be forthcoming shortly.
>
> Due to that type of work, hobbes is currently unavaliable as buildd, BTW.

That's okay, kernel support is good!

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: