[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bug status

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 04:11:31PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >
> >> > emacs21: somehow got magically fixed, just retry with new gcc
> >> 
> >> still failing on the buildds
> >
> > The weird build system had me confused there.
> > Anyway, I fixed one gcc bug, but now it's failing a bit later and it's 
> > rather hard to get something reproducable now and my knowledge of lisp is 
> > limited. 
> > It compiles with -O0, so if someone wants to look into it, one possibility 
> > would be to compare the behaviour between a version compiled with -O0 and 
> > -O1 and try to locate the point where it behaves different.
> >
> > bye, Roman
> Could we make an upload with -O0 for m68k? There are several packages
> stuck on emacs21.

About 9 packages. :)

I'm not in a position to do this right now, but I'll get to it
eventually if no one else does. If someone else want to give it a go, 
please drop a note to 329092 that it now builds with -O0. It might be 
good to test one of the packages that build-deps on it to see if it 
will work with the -O0 version before upload.

Maybe also update the bug report with what -O1 does.



Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: