Re: QEMU (was: benchmark between aranym and crest)
On do, 2006-10-12 at 18:37 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > So we see that aranym-amd64 and aranym-i386 are about the same
> > > speed, that crest is between 3 and 4 times faster and that the
> > > host is between 250 and 400 times faster.
> > Thanks for doing such an extensive benchmark. For testing package builds,
> > we really need Petr's disk access speedups ...
> Which brings us to another question: would qemu for m68k be faster?
Heh. It probably would be.
I once started an m68k version, thinking it might help Debian. I had
most of the complicated addressing modes implemented too. I got stuck
when I ran into FPU instructions in the C startup code.
Kars, too many projects, too little time.