On wo, 2006-10-18 at 14:33 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Kars de Jong wrote:
> > On do, 2006-10-12 at 18:37 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > > So we see that aranym-amd64 and aranym-i386 are about the same
> > > > > speed, that crest is between 3 and 4 times faster and that the
> > > > > host is between 250 and 400 times faster.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for doing such an extensive benchmark. For testing package builds,
> > > > we really need Petr's disk access speedups ...
> > >
> > > Which brings us to another question: would qemu for m68k be faster?
> > Heh. It probably would be.
> > I once started an m68k version, thinking it might help Debian. I had
> > most of the complicated addressing modes implemented too. I got stuck
> > when I ran into FPU instructions in the C startup code.
> Generating an exception and just letting the FPU emulator in the kernel
> handle it didn't work?
Umm, no, this was user mode emulation. I figured that would be easier to
implement (and also more useful for Debian) than full system emulation.
Besides, what system would it emulate? There are many m68k systems out
- Re: QEMU
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Re: QEMU
- From: Bill Allombert <email@example.com>