Re: Results of various tests with MVME167
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Kars de Jong wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 22:14, Kars de Jong wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 21:38, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > You are saying we need to build 2.4.27 with this too? What about 2.4.26,
> > > does that debian version work?
> >
> > No idea, I'll try it tomorrow.
>
> Tried it, didn't work. Again, my own-compiled 2.4.26 did work
> (CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK defined).
>
> This might have started to break since 2.4.19, which is when Richard
> Zidlicky reported things breaking for him. This is when
> WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL was introduced in asm-m68k/page.h, which seems to have
> fixed it for Richard in 2.4.x kernels.
>
> > I'll try the MVME147 kernels tomorrow as well.
>
> Sorry, didn't have time for that.
>
> Anyway, I'm going on holiday for the next 2 1/2 weeks, so I leave you to
> figure it out. Surely there are more people with an MVME16x board? At
> least Nick Holgate seems to have one.
I have two (but only one case, so...)
2.4 didn't work for me either the one time I tried (sounds like I
should've tried more versions than just that single one), which is why
d-i for VME uses 2.2 now.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Reply to: