[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: linux-2.4.20 CVS kernel-image for atari



Hi Christian,

I've also installed the 2.4.20 available on your www page.  My dmesg
is available on http://www.luminet.net/~lancetag/dmesg.

I am testing on an Amiga 2000 with 16M on a GVP 030 and 6M on a GVP
RAM card. The other 2M is used by my EGS video card.  I load the
module for the A2065 ethernet card.

I have found that AFFS partitions can be mounted, but errors are
displayed during the mounting procedure.  The errors have to do
with not finding FAT information.  The partition I have tested on
so far was mounted though, and I was able to copy information to it.

So far I have set up my memfile for 15M of 32-bit RAM and 6M of
16-bit RAM.  I have found on the 2.2.10 and 2.2.20 that the system
seems to be more reliable when that last 1M of the 32-bit is not used.
I'm going to see if I can use the entire available memory and
see what happens.

--Lance

> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:27:27PM +0100, Storm66 wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 16:11, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > 
> > I use Amiga kernels (and test it) as soon as possible and as often as
> > possible. I confirm that the 2.4.20 kernel is stable, it does not hang
> > any more as it was in december. I had it running 5 days without a
> > problem and stopping only as I want to use AMigaDOS.
> 
> Good to hear, mine has been running now 2.5 days, built mozilla and a few
> smaller packages. So I am pretty confident (except for affs...).
> 
> > If I can help to test anything .....
> 
> It would be good if you could test the kernel-image I made, see if it works
> for you (you and me have pretty much identical hardware, it would be good if
> other hardware were tested, too), have any comments on the config, want
> more/less modules, etc. If the devfs works, haven't tested that myself yet.
> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 




Reply to: