On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:34:48PM +0200, Siggi Langauf wrote: > On Fri, 3 May 2002, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > [...] > > No but the older version (0.9.8-2) seemed to compile fine. I wonder what > > changed? > > Me too, that's why I asked. That's especially surprising as all the other > autobuilders didn't have a problem. I'd suspect a gcc upgrade... Indeed, there has been just such an upgrade to gcc since 0.9.8-2. Maybe you'll want to bounce the bug to gcc. > > FWIW: we bounced it to at least three different machines, so it's not > > specific to a particular m68k box or architecture. > > upgrade on all the machines?? Perhaps I should have said we have m68k/mac and m68k/amiga buildd machines, at least. Sometimes things work differently on each. I suspect that are all pretty up-to-date with their buildd chroots. > > I'd be happy to create you an account on my machine, although it's not > > even close to the fastest in the fleet. > > Well, the failure is quite early in the build process, so CPU speed won't > really important. I could _try_ to investigate this... If I can help, let me know. > > I filed a bug just before I read this, hope that doesn't annoy. > > Hmmm, I usually find all bugs annoying, but I don't tell people unless the > bug wasn't really a bug, but something else failing, so let's see if it > "does annoy" ;-) I've been flamed for filing FTBFS bugs after they've been brought up in a public forum -- just trying to do my duty. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
pgpEqOFflecwJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature