Re: problem upgrading to stable
- To: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: problem upgrading to stable
- From: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:23:36 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20010316122336.A13233@ap031.experimentalphysik.uni-kiel.de>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20010227231524.A28273@wsl01.informatik.uni-ulm.de>; from michael.fedrowitz@informatik.uni-ulm.de on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:15:24PM +0100
- References: <20010226113819.A19704@wsl01.informatik.uni-ulm.de> <20010227083126.A11514@silly.cloud.net.au> <20010227141535.C26036@wsl01.informatik.uni-ulm.de> <20010228002450.A14672@silly.cloud.net.au> <20010227073301.I17416@debian.org> <20010228003715.A14772@silly.cloud.net.au> <20010227074054.K17416@debian.org> <20010228074043.A16281@silly.cloud.net.au> <20010227222048.A2581@skeeve.ddts.net> <20010227231524.A28273@wsl01.informatik.uni-ulm.de>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:15:24PM +0100, Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
>
> Ick. Does that mean that the 2.2.1-1 currently in the archives has been
> built with 2.4 headers, too? That would explain quite a lot... At least the
libc6_2.2.2-1_m68k.deb is in the archive. Built with 2.2.10.
Christian
--
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/potato
Reply to: