Re: Updated glibc 2.1 packages
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:36:34AM +0200, Roman Hodek wrote:
> Did you use gcc 2.95.2? Which version exactly? I didn't dare compiling
> a new glibc2.1 with that compiler, because it had some bugs with
> shared libs... It doesn't matter much if libssl09 is broken due to
> this, but if libc would be broken? :-)
Eeek, gcc 2.95.2 is broken with shlibs? I hadn't seen anything on
debian-toolchain about that - what exactly are the symptoms?
These are compiled with egcs 1.1.2 - I'm rebuilding gcc 2.95.2 against them
in order to get a libstdc++2.10-glibc2.1 (I'll put these up soon too).
Oh, I guess I should rebuild ncurses and such too.
If we go to glibc 2.1, how will the libstdc++ transition work? I didn't
really pay much attention to it when it landed on i386...
--
You do{} stuff. Then it's $done. Then you die().
Reply to: