Hey folks,
first of all, I don't want to ruffle any feathers here or to talk down the
work already done on the sponsosrship broschure ...or the need for
sponsorship. But... ;)
I'm very unsure if the level of visible incorporation of sponsors into
DebConf proposed in the current draft is really what we want. To illustrate
my concerns I list some points from the current broschure draft:
* having a sponsor opening the conference dinner with a few words
* having a sponsor opening the cheese&wine party with a few words (after an
opening by christian)
* Incorporating a hardware infrastructure sponsors name into the wifi ESSID
* Having sponsored lottery prices every morning
* ...
I'll not comment on my personal feelings in detail, but my general feeling
is not positive. At the moment I'm not sure if I am oversensitive on this
topic and would like you to look at the current draft of the broschure and
comment on it. Give me a senity check here :)
Cheers,
Rhalina
--
rhalina (Franziska Lichtblau) rhalina@old-forest.org
lichtblau@cip.ifi.lmu.de
«I refuse to be bound by software I cannot trust and negotiate with.»
-- Enrico Zini --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature