On 08/21/2013 03:30 PM, Richard Hartmann wrote: > Very valid point. Asking this via penta would allow the talks team to > schedule such talks in untaped rooms. as someone who has been on the talks team in the past (i was basically AWOL this year) it would help us in talk scheduling to have a tristate option in penta for talk submitters: A) "I would like this talk to be recorded by the video team if possible" (default) B) "I DO NOT want this talk to be recorded by the video team at all" C) "If accepted, this talk MUST BE recorded by the video team" (note that users who choose C (e.g. for BoFs which need participation from someone remote) may find that their talk is simply not scheduled at all if there is no available capacity for recording) > There's still the option of "audio and slides only", but unless that's > an actual option it's hard to gauge interest in this. That would will > allow remote participation, arguably making it even easier. hm, this starts to make the set of options that we ask the submitter to choose between more complex, but i could see it as a fourth option as well. Is it feasible to tune penta (or its successor) by adding this field to talk submissions? --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature