Re: Talk/event proposals "Closed source"
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@cateee.net> wrote:
> On 20.03.2018 23:07, Carl Karsten wrote:
>
>> Can someone elaborate on why
>> "unfortunately means rejecting some."
>> is a reason to keep anything about this secret?
>
> Because if we make public the rejection, less people will submit talks.
>
> Debian (and Free Software) communities suffer of the impostor syndrome.
>
> Additionally, having own name in a rejection list, forever accessible,
> could seem not so good for future employment.
>
> Keeping secret rejection allow us to get more submission (and good one).
>
OK, unfortunate, but yeah, such is reality. thanks.
> ciao
> cate
Reply to: