Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf17 bids - DebConf Committee
Le jeudi, 17 décembre 2015, 12.49:32 Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
> As Didier said already replying to Steve, I am among the people
> responding "yes" to the call. There is one bit that I do feel
> important: We can reach a consensus as to which bid is more apt in our
> eyes, but formally, we don't have a delegated body to make things
> formal.
I think we can act according to the pre-existing rules, and that we
should.
>From https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Bid_process#Venue_decision:
> The DebConf Committee is made up of the delegated DebConf chairs and
> additional members recruited by the Chairs from those with a long-term
> interest in helping organise DebConf.
Without delegated DebConf chairs, this boils down to "additional members
recruited by the Chairs". By checking with the actual members of the
DebConf Committee (as recruited by past Chairs), we only shrink it, and
don't engage in actual recruitement [0].
Given the general "DebConf Team" situation, I would really like us to
focus on using the existing structures for what they got built, rather
than having meta-discussions, which will only delay the DC17 decision. I
don't see value in postponing the DC17 decision until after the DebConf
governance tensions have been relaxed.
Cheers,
OdyX
[0] As I said already; my own position is somewhat weird, as I had
previously resigned (genuinely forgot that facṫ…) I'm happy to step back
if that action improves the wider situation, really.
Reply to: