Le dimanche, 30 août 2015, 00.07:43 Margarita Manterola a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Michael Banck wrote: > > In related news, I started a skeleton DC15 report during DebCamp and > > uli Scholler said he would help with typesetting again. On the > > other hand, I heard from the DC16 camp that they might try scribus > > this time. > > I did scribus for DC8 and would be happy to do it for DC15 as well. I > believe it looks much much nicer. I do think that it's DC15's report > and it's DC15's responsibility to get it out, though. There should be no obligation felt from any DCn team to re-use the LaTeX typesetting mechanisms used in past editions. Sure, there was quite some (fun) work invested in macros for pictures, quotes, articles, and a translation mechanism based on po4a. The DC{13,14} final reports have this nice LaTeX feeling that I personally find beautiful; and it is certainly possible to apply a lot of LaTeX mastery to get to Scribus- beauty equivalence. That said, the tools should be supportive for the work, not constraining it; so if the people who will put the work for the DC14 report want to use Scribus instead, by all means: enjoy! There will be no bad feelings whatsoever! Cheers, OdyX
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.