also sprach Maximiliano Curia <maxy@gnuservers.com.ar> [2015-03-30 14:13 +0200]:
> I wouldn't like to have a fixed time for non-video-recorded
> events, nor promote them by requiring to have one of them each
> day, nor demote them to second class events that occur while
> people is eating.
I am really failing so see how this has anything to do with video.
The official schedule has 90 Minutes for lunch during which
I presume the video team members get to eat, along with the
majority. Why does that have any bearing on whether lunch opens or
closes a little earlier/later?
> I have no opinion about the ad-hoc session, only that the current
> schedule proposals only shows them in the afternoon.
We're probably not going to actively prevent "ad-hoc" sessions in
the morning either. What's the benefit of colouring specific times
for "ad-hoc" events, rather than just declaring *all other times*
than in the schedule to be available for ad-hoc meetings? Sure, we
have to do room allocation somewhat, but other than that there
remains a stark paradox in the idea of scheduling ad-hoc stuff.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)