also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <eric@zhevny.com> [2015-01-21 19:18 +0100]:
> I propose to wait 1 week for discussion. If there is consensus that this
> is a good idea I'll take the action item to request the psuedo-package
> from the BTS admins, pointing to this thread as rationale and evidence
> of team support. If there is no response or significant disagreement, I
> suggest it be added to the 2015-02-02 meeting agenda.
Honestly, I don't think we need a team discussion. This should be
the infrastructure team's decision just like upstream choses the
BTS/issue tracker for their software.
That said, I think the proposal is sane and would rather see it done
sooner than later, unless of course there are good arguments against
it.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16: Cape Town or Montreal? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)