Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:02:58PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On 21/05/14 02:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > are coming as "volunteers". The format this year has been deliberately
> > designed to improve upon the status quo, with the explicit understanding
> > that people who are actually coming with a work plan can ask the DPL for a
> > sprint before DebConf. (And I think it's a major regression that the DC15
> > team has reverted this by reintroducing DebCamp for next year.)
>
> As far as I know, there has been no consensus on DC orga about this, so
> it is not a regression. DC14 decided they don't want DebCamp, and DC15
> decided that they do want it. I would have loved to have this
> discussion, but every time I've tried to raise it, it was mostly ignored.
I think we should have a BoF towards the end of DC14 with hopefully most
of the DC/DC14/DC15 organizers about this, do a post-mortem on how it
worked out for DC14 and see whether/how we can tune things for DC15.
Or, if that is not possible anymore, try to come up with a consensus for
DC16+.
Michael
Reply to: