Re: [Debconf-team] Accommodation numbers/upgrades/communal accommodation
Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org> writes:
> [Ganneff: Could you please add a munin graph with the answers to the com_accom
> question or provide the numbers by email, Thanks]
>
> Moray Allan <moray@sermisy.org> writes:
>
>> We are now (by tomorrow) at the end of the period for applying for
>> sponsorship, so the next set of decisions about room utilisation etc.
>> should be made soon.
>>
>> How many people have registered for what room categories currently, and
>> how does that compare to the available rooms? How many sponsored people
>> said they would/wouldn't take "communal" accommodation?
>
> The room categories are visible in this munin graph [1]. Additional data
> about the "Debian role" is available in the admin interface.
>
> Current status:
> All / accompany / interested / None / not selected
> Own accomodation: 26 / 0 / 10 / 3 / 0
> Sponsored accomodation: 121 / 0 / 5 / 0 / 0
> self-paid communal: 16 / 0 / 3 / 1 / 1
> self-paid camping: 13 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
> (+ 20 requesting sponsored accomodation and prefering camping)
> self-paid 8 bed: 27 / 1 / 3 / 1 / 0
> self-paid 2 bed: 27 / 0 / 2 / 0 / 1
>
> Not taking into account any additional requirements this means we have
> enough rooms for all these requests.
>
>>
>> We should clarify soon for people already registered what kind of room
>> they can expect to receive, and, e.g. give them the chance to pay for a
>> better room if they aren't happy with that one.
>
> I think we should as soon as possible confirm the rooms for those that
> choose a self-paid room. For the upgrades we have first to find a more
> or less consensual way of doing this. As a discussion basis for this we
> need to know the answers for the survey questions. AFAICS these are
> currently not accessible in a munin graph or in the admin interface. As
> it looks now, we still have beds available in each category.
I just got read access to the penta DB and tried to retrive the data
about the communal accomodation survey [1]:
95 would accept communal accomodation
17 would *not* accept
I'll try to produce more detailed statistics tomorrow.
Gaudenz
[1] I used the following SQL query, wich if I understood the DB layout
right should only include those that requested sponsored accomodation
(accom_id=22) and plan to attend DC13 (attend=true and conference_id=7)
select attend, person.person_id, person.public_name, conference_id,
com_accom from debconf.dc_conference_person join person on
debconf.dc_conference_person.person_id = person.person_id where
conference_id=7 and attend=true and com_accom=false and accom_id=22;
>
> A meeting to discuss how to proceed is scheduled for tomorrow 1800 UTC
> in #debconf-team. Unfortunately this meeting was not announced on-list
> yet it's just mentioned in the IRC topic. IIRC the plan was to announce
> it with a reply to the last meeting's minutes, but this never happened.
>
> Gaudenz
>
>>
>> (That doesn't necessarily mean cheaper "upgrades" beyond the current
>> pricing, as some team members suggested, but we should start to clarify
>> things beyond the very vague options most people selected so far.)
>>
>
> Gaudenz
>
> [1]
> http://munin.debconf.org/debconf.org/skinner.debconf.org-penta_accomodation.html
>
>> --
>> Moray
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debconf-team mailing list
>> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
>> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
>
> --
> Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
> Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
> ~ Samuel Beckett ~
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf-team mailing list
> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
--
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
~ Samuel Beckett ~
Reply to: