On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:35:17PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > (Also, Holger is not the one who will be sued because he is not a > member of the dc13 association committee) I think this is an unacceptable distinction. Whoever, if any, get sued as a representative of the Debian Project---and people who do sign a DebConf relate contract *clearly* qualify---will have Debian's backing, in finance, legal advice, communication, fund-raising, ... you name it. This is so at least as long as I'm DPL, but I'm pretty sure any future DPL will be willing to do the same. So please don't go down this path. The distinction between who is a member of the dc13 association and who is not should play no role in the decision making process. And, more importantly, should induce no fracture or finger pointing in the community. Thanks, -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature