Hi, On Samstag, 12. März 2011, Andrew McMillan wrote: > I think it should be straightforward for us to agree to this, since it > is a request for *additional* licensing, not a request to change > existing licensing. Also, since the requested additional license is > generally more restrictive than the existing license it should make it > even more easy for us to agree. > > In any case, as a member of the DebConf Videoteam I am personally happy > for this talk to be additionally made available under the CC-BY-SA > license. me too. Thanks Andrew for bringing us back to the boring but relevant parts of the discussion! :) cheers, Holger (but the point/question from my previous mail still stands, _we_ have to change the licence - or?)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.