On 06/01/2010 10:38 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> > Another advantage [to having plenaries] might be to communicate specific concerns to the >> > broader group, for example if we have a wrap-up session with reportbacks >> > from track coordinators, bosnia/DC11 exhortations, and RCBC victor >> > announcements. >> > >> > Do you see any advantages to having plenaries? Any disadvantages? > > I think you described the advantages well :-) i'll take that as a +1 for plenaries ;) > Another topic I'd probably like to see explained and discussed is the status > quo of the squeeze release. It's kind of the main topic of Debian ;) hrm. The only release team-ish talk i see is https://penta.debconf.org/penta/pentabarf/event/552 from Philipp Kern (cc'ed here), which doesn't sound like the plenary topic you've proposed exactly (it seems to be more about the general practice, rather than the specific release of squeeze). Would either of you (Philipp or Holger) be up for bringing this idea to the release team and seeing if they have anyone who wants to propose such a thing? It's very last-minute for a proposal, but i'd imagine we all agree that a capable proposal about the state of the Squeeze release would be a Good Thing. I certainly think it'd be potential plenary material. --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature