[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] talks team followup: scheduling and plenaries



Hi,

On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> One potential advantage of having plenary talks might be a better sense
> of cohesion for attendees.
>
> However, we already have the day trip and the formal dinner as events
> which i expect will do some of that.  And of course, no one is proposing
> required attendance or anything silly like that.  The hacklab will still
> be open, and some people will no doubt be sleeping or eating elsewhere.
>
> Another advantage might be to communicate specific concerns to the
> broader group, for example if we have a wrap-up session with reportbacks
> from track coordinators, bosnia/DC11 exhortations, and RCBC victor
> announcements.
>
> Do you see any advantages to having plenaries?  Any disadvantages?

I think you described the advantages well :-)

Another topic I'd probably like to see explained and discussed is the status 
quo of the squeeze release. It's kind of the main topic of Debian ;)


cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: