Hi, btw, I got your mail twice. On Tuesday 07 November 2006 22:36, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > future DebConfs should be even better prepared than they are now, thats > > why we (debconf-team) decided to plan DebConfs for two years in advance > > from now. > That heavily implies we are doing a bad job. Hm. I tried to word it, so it doesnt sound like this. (But it seems I wasn't so successful :) Any suggestions for a better wording? > Currently I dislike the idea of deciding on DebConf9 Location in > Edinburgh. Maybe 2 or 3 months after it. Still a long time then until > the Conf. Hm, thats what we discussed the first time in Mexico even, IIRC, and I never heard objections to it. But of course you can only raise objections once you realize them :) I still like the idea of sitting together at DebConf and discussing and deciding the venue in RL, but I see your point. Other opinions on this? > Reason - we are working on DC7 right now. The decision for DC8 is coming > soon also. And then preparing enough for a DC9 bid (Germany wants to > have a DebConf then! :) ) seems to be a bit much in my eyes currently. Drop the idea of having DebConf in Germany then ;-) *eg* More seriously I dont think the DebConf8 decision procedure should still be relevant by then... (for the people bidding for 9) > > P.S.: And off course, you can also start planning for DebConf9 now ;-) > For reasons said above I would drop that. No. Anybody can start thinking about 2009 now - it's also partly a joke. Thanks for the other comments! I will wait for other replies and send a second draft either later today or tomorrow. regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpYY6PE1iVBh.pgp
Description: PGP signature