Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/2006 06:11 AM, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
[...]
> Now, back to the original question of pending tasks.
>
> Felipe suggested [0] two things (good suggestions IMO): to ask Andreas
> for more items to go on the list, and to ask Andreas for help in
> carrying out the tasks themselves. I think it's quite reasonable --
> wise, even -- of Andreas not to involve himself with the latter, given
> the current circumstances.
>
> [0] http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20060725.125603.4d2432b8.en.html
In fact, I was expecting that *maybe* Andreas would find a
way to work for DebConf once again, that *maybe* starting helping
to finish DC6 tasks he would find his way back into DebConf stuff.
:-)
> As for assembling the list: what makes you think Andreas has the list I
> asked for? He doesn't. It's distributed over several persons as it
> should be when a team effort is running. The partial one he does have, I
> have already discussed with him both face-to-face during DebConf6 as
> well as briefly over the phone. My reason for asking publicly was
> precisely that different people may have different tasks pending, and
> are now in uncertainty about what to do with them. This is about getting
> closure for DebConf6, not hearing yet again the cackle about
> disappointment and whose fault it is that we are in the current
> situation.
>
> So I repeat the questions:
>
> I'd like to know what tasks people still have pending from DebConf6, and
> what you all think we should do about them.
I still have to sent to you (Fabian) a report about helping
the Orga Team for the first time. (I had problems sending mail to
you, but it is off-topic to the list).
> Are there any good reasons not to drop all these tasks and consider
> DebConf6 an abandoned project?
Yes. As good reasons I could think of:
- All the DebConf6 attendees;
- the future DebConfs
- our sponsors
> I'll add another one that comes to mind now:
> What is the minimal set of tasks that must be done to bring DebConf6 to
> a (legal) conclusion?
I really think that we need some input from Gunnar on all
that subjects/matters. :)
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEx3zQCjAO0JDlykYRAn8TAJ912zTSFiPQnigNhQoBy+/WrdSuBgCgt+3u
D6TxS8qWlucHwdUn4zqwqkA=
=cBw4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: