Re: [Debconf-team] Unfinished tasks from DebConf6
Hi Jimmy,
you used the right words, it "appears" and it "seems" to you that this was
a "status quo" state, but it might not have reflected the state as it has
actually been in.
Regards,
Safir
> Andreas,
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>> So the removed authority (and corresponding responsibility) was
>> in no way only limited to the debconf7 location but rather about
>> debconf in general.
>
> Right now I'm not going to address the issue of whether you should or
> should not help finish DebConf6 matters, but I will point out that in
> the email where the DPL made the delegation which he later withdrew, it
> was clearly limited in scope to be about "the decision of which of the
> two cities [i.e. EDI and SJJ] will host the next DebConf [i.e.,
> DebConf7]", and not related to anything else about DebConf. Similarly,
> in his withdrawal email, he refers to the delegation as being about "the
> decision on where to hold DebConf 2007" or "the venue decision". Check
> the emails for yourself if you don't recall these details.
>
> It appears to me that him granting a delegation beyond what was already
> the status quo and then removing it leaves the status quo unchanged from
> before the delegation, and it further seems that none of this needs to
> affect your status in or involvement with the DebConf team, either for
> DebConf6 issues or beyond. Certainly most other DebConf team members
> whose delegations were granted and withdrawn seem to have interpreted it
> that way. How you react is, of course, your decision.
>
> - Jimmy Kaplowitz
> jimmy@debian.org
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf-team mailing list
> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
>
>
Reply to: