[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] Criteria for Debconf location decision



Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy@debian.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:37:15PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Firstly, let me stress that I'm not involved in the Edinburgh bid at all 
>> - for a variety of reasons, I'm unlikely to make Debconf next year even 
>> if it gets held in my house. These are my own opinions.
> [opinions snipped]
>
> I agree with pretty much all the opinions you said above. Well said.
> Especially relevant is that it's not at all clear city which would be
> better for advocacy in the end, and that it's really unrelated to
> DebConf's primary purposes anyway. I go to DebConf to network with other
> Debian developers, to hack, and generally move the project forward in
> various ways. Advocacy is nice for Debian Day, but not as a criterion in
> choosing the location.

Agreed.

That also should be considered costs and how many people could go
otherwise we loose abrangency.

Culture shouldn't be considerated, IMHO.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Reply to: