---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: DebConf "Legal" BoF continued - lets get it to a Delegation Date: Friday 09 June 2006 17:35 From: Andreas Schuldei <andreas@schuldei.org> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:24:34PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > as the DebConf organizers[1], responsible to organize the yearly > > Conference. The DPL grants the DebConf Organizers the right to use money > > From every legal organization that works for/with Debian, such as SPI in > > America or ffis ev in Germany, to name only two examples, without further > > interaction of the DPL or anyone else, if that money was marked as being > > for the Conference. They also have the right to freely select other > > people to do parts of the needed work, no matter if they are DDs or > > not.[2] > > thinking about it, there should be a distinction between the core team > and teh delegates. the core team should be bigger then the core team, the core team should not be limited to the delegates but contain the other organizers of a given debconf. > which contains the organizers of a given debconf and is more flexible. > > i would like to keep things undefined if they dont need defining, in > order to dont create restraining structures. -------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpaUdY9GK5Qs.pgp
Description: PGP signature