Martín Ferrari <tincho@debian.org> writes: > Choice of team(s) and nominations(s) > ------------------------------------ > > Facilities team: > Want to be a member: [ ] > Candidate(s) for lead/shadow: > Rationale (optional): > > Content team: > Want to be a member: [ ] > Candidate(s) for lead/shadow: > Rationale (optional): > > Infrastructure team: > Want to be a member: [X] > Candidate(s) for lead/shadow: Hard to tell without knowing who else > nominates himself... > Rationale (optional): > > Attendee assistance team: > Want to be a member: [ ] > Candidate(s) for lead/shadow: > Rationale (optional): > > DebConf coordination team: > Want to be a member: [ ] > Candidate(s) for lead/shadow: > Rationale (optional): > > General comments: In general I would also be interested in working in the "DebConf coordination team" but with the current proposal the separation of this team from the chair role is not clear enough to me. It also highly depends on the other members of that team and if they want to work with me or not (and vice versa). If working on that team I'm not much interested in the treasurer role that's now also part of it. If working on the coordination team would be appreciated, I would resign from the Infrastructure team, as I'm already part of the Fundraising team and I completely agree that being on 2 teams should be the maximum. Gaudenz
Attachment:
pgpUs3QM9MGON.pgp
Description: PGP signature