On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:13:51PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >>> DebConf13: Call for keys for keysigning in Vaumarcus, Switzerland What with 2048R keys? Is there a reason to replace them already, or are they ok for now? As I understand, only 1024D keys are considered risky. In 2009 I was told (not sure by whom: could be you but I don't really remember) to use 2048R because 4096 is not supported by some software. I currently have two keys: 2048R/EAC68101 -- primary 4096R/8F61E158 -- collecting signatures in case of a rollover Normally a weaker but still secure key with more signatures is better, but in this case, a single debconf keysigning party instantly makes a key well-connected. So, what should I do? Keep it as-is, or drop the 2048 key and replace it with a freshly generated one? -- ᛊᚨᚾᛁᛏᚣ᛫ᛁᛊ᛫ᚠᛟᚱ᛫ᚦᛖ᛫ᚹᛖᚨᚲ
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature