* Csillag Tamas <cstamas@digitus.itk.ppke.hu> [110801 11:06]: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:02:22AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Why is Gobby prefered over Etherpad for the BOFs and talks at Debconf? > > Personally I prefer Etherpat (I normally use <URL: http://titanpad.com/ >) > > because it only require a functioning browser, and there is no need to > > ask participants to install extra software. As far as I can see, the > > feature set is compatible, and I fail to notice anything relevant > > where Gobby is doing a lot better. The only slight improvement is the > > directory browsing, but that to medo not seem to be enough reason to > > require extra software to be installed to write text. > > > > Anyone care to explain why they prefer Gobby over Etherpad at Debconf? > > Because as far as I see titanpad is a propriatory sw that runs on > someones server. At the same time gobby is installed on debian servers > so we do not rely on a 3rd party. EtherPad is free software (Apache license). If you're looking for the source code that runs titanpad.com, look here: https://github.com/titanpad/titanpad -ch (with this titanpad hat on) -- christian hofstaedtler
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature